|
| 阅读上一个主题 :: 阅读下一个主题 |
| 作者 |
 解构芦大师的“自私是生命的存在方式”学说 |
 |
| 所跟贴 |
解构芦大师的“自私是生命的存在方式”学说 -- bystander - (3988 Byte) 2005-2-23 周三, 下午6:32 (1028 reads) |
芦笛
[博客]
[个人文集]
论坛管理员
.gif)
加入时间: 2004/02/14
文章: 31803
经验值: 519161
|
|
|
作者：芦笛 在 罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org
"更可恶的是有位自称真正懂得科学的先生，不敢去摸芦大师的老虎屁股，却偏偏要来拥旁观者的马蜂窝，所以才逼不得已出来表表态。老芦经常说这论坛上高手如云，难道就是指这种说不出半句正经话的愤青？"
That's part of web life. You've got to put up with it and learn to speak regardless of the noise. Otherwise you would definitely end up as a bully like me. As I have noticed, Lu Su is deteriorating exactly the same way as I did 3 or 4 years ago.
I see your points which are very stimulating and enlightening. However, I regret to say that there is a great confusion of concepts, the typical example being:
除非老芦所说的“自私”是个先验、不证自明的概念，否则这种因应情况为理论中的概念加入条件的做法，只会令理论本身变成无法证伪的形而上学。
If you were really familiar with science history, you would not have said that:))
There are quite a few misundersandings as well. Like this para:
从胡涂学说中推论出胡涂的论点，不足为怪。难怪芦大师质疑无业游民有关猿猴的论述时，提出了一个颇为愚昧的问题：“可以设想，在你的猿群中，死的总是那些英勇者，活下来的总是望风先遁的胆小鬼。如此筛选下来，应该是胆小鬼能传子孙，是不是？”
You did not get it. I was trying to falsify his argument using reasoning. It's of course "从胡涂学说中推论出胡涂的论点", but unfortunately, the 胡涂学说 is not mine. This is the most common way to pinpoint the fault of others’ reasoning.
I wish I could write in Chinese. Anyway, I will write a Chinese poster in response, when I am free.
Thank you for your criticisms!
作者：芦笛 在 罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org |
|
|
| 返回顶端 |
|
 |
| |
|
|
您不能在本论坛发表新主题
您不能在本论坛回复主题
您不能在本论坛编辑自己的文章
您不能在本论坛删除自己的文章
您不能在本论坛发表投票
您不能在这个论坛添加附件
您不能在这个论坛下载文件
|
based on phpbb, All rights reserved.
|
