|
| 阅读上一个主题 :: 阅读下一个主题 |
| 作者 |
 2001年全美工资最高学校男女教授平均工资(有连接，包括哈佛大学) |
 |
| 所跟贴 |
本看好戏坦白交代：Association of American Universities -- Anonymous - (6524 Byte) 2002-1-25 周五, 上午3:56 (87 reads) |
韩建
[博客]
[个人文集]
游客
|
|
|
作者：Anonymous 在 罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org
Just like if you are a Harvard MIT or Beida grad, you are an automatic genius? If your school is in this association, it is automatically a great school? If you think Kansas, Nebraska, Missouri, Iowa st., Syracuse, Pittsburgh, are acadenically better than Rockefeller, Dartmouth, Notra Dame, Georgetown, tufts, Georgia tech, Amherst, or Swarthmore, I would say you are out of your mind. We are not talking about playing basketball or football here, are we?
US news ranking is not perfect but it is one of the most complete and most widely recognizable and accepted ranking system for US universities. Reputation score here used to be called academic reputation. If the ranking does not make sense to somebody, this score is close enough to reflect school's "academic archievement". 3.3/5.0 would only get Rutgers around 75 among schools with phD programs and clearly out of 120 if you count in the four year colleges. Maybe the US news ranking is too commercialized. But if Rutgers could buy their professors with money, how could you be so sure that they did not buy their way into the AAU or buy them in a higher place in the rankings? I think they already did.
作者：Anonymous 在 罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org |
|
|
| 返回顶端 |
|
 |
| |
|
|
您不能在本论坛发表新主题
您不能在本论坛回复主题
您不能在本论坛编辑自己的文章
您不能在本论坛删除自己的文章
您不能在本论坛发表投票
您不能在这个论坛添加附件
您不能在这个论坛下载文件
|
based on phpbb, All rights reserved.
|
