|
| 阅读上一个主题 :: 阅读下一个主题 |
| 作者 |
 为了您的安全，请穿上防弹服去逛美国商场 |
 |
| 所跟贴 |
问题是, 这两个案例, 没有可比性, 不能被引用. Trespassing 本身不能构成杀人理由, 你还是没理解. -- captain nino - (1848 Byte) 2012-12-23 周日, 下午6:52 (422 reads) |
芦笛
[博客]
[个人文集]
论坛管理员
.gif)
加入时间: 2004/02/14
文章: 31804
经验值: 519191
|
|
|
作者：芦笛 在 驴鸣镇 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org
Initially, the local police quickly questioned and released Peairs, and declined to charge him with any crime. They felt that "Peairs had been within his rights in shooting the trespasser."[4] Only after the governor of Louisiana and the New Orleans Japan consul general protested, did Peairs get charged with manslaughter.
如果不是日本領事抗議，這案件根本就不會立案。
They felt that "Peairs had been within his rights in shooting the trespasser."
這兒可根本沒說什麽受到威脅，當地警察的理解就是他有足夠的權利射殺trespasser，什麽criminal intent云云，全是後來在審訊中扯出來的。看來你還得對新奧爾良的警察們進行普法教育。
另外，你忘記了引用這段話：
Contrary to Peairs's claim that Hattori was moving strangely and quickly towards him, forensic evidence demonstrates that Hattori was moving slowly, or not at all, and his arms were away from his body, indicating he was no threat. Overall, a far greater show of force was used than was appropriate.[9
作者：芦笛 在 驴鸣镇 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org
上一次由芦笛于2012-12-24 周一, 上午9:23修改，总共修改了1次 |
|
|
| 返回顶端 |
|
 |
| |
|
|
您不能在本论坛发表新主题
您不能在本论坛回复主题
您不能在本论坛编辑自己的文章
您不能在本论坛删除自己的文章
您不能在本论坛发表投票
您不能在这个论坛添加附件
您可以在这个论坛下载文件
|
based on phpbb, All rights reserved.
|
