|
| 阅读上一个主题 :: 阅读下一个主题 |
| 作者 |
 竭诚请教网友 |
 |
| 所跟贴 |
恩，老唐淵博，佩服，可惜有點概念不清，或許是我沒說清楚 -- 芦笛 - (216 Byte) 2010-5-07 周五, 上午3:23 (103 reads) |
唐好色
[个人文集]
加入时间: 2006/03/20
文章: 3893
经验值: 67892
|
|
|
作者：唐好色 在 驴鸣镇 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org
My point was that everyone was talking nonsense, including some reasonably intelligent people. The ancients didn't say too many stupid things because there wasn't any urgency to resolve the dilemma. By late 18th and early 19th century, calculus was in wide use and there was a problem at its foundation and they had to resolve it. This brought the matter to the forefront. So everyone was throwing up ideas and most of them were wrong and silly. When this happens, pseudo-science/mathematics tends to flourish. Witness how many amateur Chinese were/are working on the Goldbach conjecture. I don't think Marx was any different. If Marx were Chinese today, he may have been working on the Goldbach conjecture. 
Of course, by Marx's time, the dilemma was actually resolved, but that was at the frontier of math research. As an amateur, Marx was behind the curve. Witness what happened today. Wiles already solved the Fermat's Last Theorem, but we still have cranks finding counter-examples.
In the end, I don't think I disagree with you that much--Marx was an amateur and not a very good one. This is not really uncommon. There are plenty of books on the market today that are even worse than what Marx wrote.
作者：唐好色 在 驴鸣镇 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org |
|
|
| 返回顶端 |
|
 |
| |
|
|
您不能在本论坛发表新主题
您不能在本论坛回复主题
您不能在本论坛编辑自己的文章
您不能在本论坛删除自己的文章
您不能在本论坛发表投票
您不能在这个论坛添加附件
您可以在这个论坛下载文件
|
based on phpbb, All rights reserved.
|
