消极
[个人文集]
加入时间: 2004/02/15
文章: 9097
经验值: 14803
|
|
|
作者：消极 在 罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org
it might be real, but not hard evidence. B can cause C doesn't mean A can't cause C. how can you rule out A? that's the arguement. the long diliberation means that there aren't hard scientific evidences to prove/disprove guilty. In a jury trial, evidence is always the key since they are present to laymen, jurors. it is judge's role to control the admission for evidence; testaments are always attacked, either by attacking personality/credit of witness or phisical/medical condition or whatever you can name it. that's the reason that forensic science is important. Watch CSI?
Just a layman's view.
作者：消极 在 罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org |
|
|
这篇刚出笼的纽约时报关于审判副总统钱尼助手LIBBY有意思
