海纳百川

登录 | 登录并检查站内短信 | 个人设置 网站首页 |  论坛首页 |  博客 |  搜索 |  收藏夹 |  帮助 |  团队  | 注册  | RSS
主题: "疯人自答说老子." 芦笛, you are quite wrong
回复主题   printer-friendly view    海纳百川首页 -> 罕见奇谈
阅读上一个主题 :: 阅读下一个主题  
作者 "疯人自答说老子." 芦笛, you are quite wrong   
所跟贴 扯淡 -- 黄药师 - (85 Byte) 2005-1-07 周五, 上午8:46 (118 reads)
ltlee
[博客]
[个人文集]

游客









文章标题: Two views on the extinction of dinosaurs (74 reads)      时间: 2005-1-07 周五, 上午9:01

作者:Anonymous罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org

The prevalent explanation is that a comet had impacted the earth. The impact created an environment comparable to a nuclear winter. The extinction of dinosaurs were therefore the results of massive sudden change which overloaded the negative feedback capability of nature.

Some scientists, however, found the comet theory lacking. They pointed out that other large animals died out frequently. Since all large animals have one thing in common. They all travel long distance in comparison with small animals like frogs. When the dinosaurs extinct, frogs survived the period intact. Hence, they thought contagious diseases carried by bacteria or virus, spread by long distance traveling, were responsible for the extinction. If so, the extinction meant a rebalance between large animal and small animals.

作者:Anonymous罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org
返回顶端
    显示文章:     
    回复主题   printer-friendly view    海纳百川首页 -> 罕见奇谈 所有的时间均为 北京时间


     
    论坛转跳:   
    不能在本论坛发表新主题
    不能在本论坛回复主题
    不能在本论坛编辑自己的文章
    不能在本论坛删除自己的文章
    不能在本论坛发表投票
    不能在这个论坛添加附件
    不能在这个论坛下载文件


    based on phpbb, All rights reserved.
    [ Page generation time: 1.017845 seconds ] :: [ 23 queries excuted ] :: [ GZIP compression enabled ]