芦笛 [博客] [个人文集]
论坛管理员
.gif)
加入时间: 2004/02/14 文章: 31797
经验值: 518954
|
|
|
作者:芦笛 在 罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org
马悲鸣, I have just read the headline of your poster, saying:
“胡不如江”重贴《弱主民之福》
Apparently, you believe “胡不如江”, since Hu is stronger than Jiang. Because the less “strong” the ruler, the more happily the people live, and because Hu is “stronger” than Jiang, so the people will live more miserably under him than under Jiang.
Am I right? If not, please do not hesitate to correct me.
If I understand you correctly, then please tell everyone why you believe so, especially Suibian, who has been standing on a table to give you the wildest applause. In particular, please answer the following questions:
1) How do you define “弱主”? Does that mean the ruler is weak in his willpower, or he is powerless, or both?
2) Why do you believe Hu has a stronger willpower or is more politically powerful than Jiang? On what ground did you draw such an important conclusion? Can you please kindly show us your evidence?
3) Can you explain how Jiang has climbed up to the top of pyramid of political power if he has no strong willpower?
4) Is a strong willpower or a strong position in the political arena a precondition for the ruler to run the country effectively and efficiently? Is it a precondition for him to punish the corrupted subordinates and hold the country together? In short, is the ruler’s sufficient authority a precondition for the society to maintain disciplines and order?
Now allow me to tell you what I really think. Personally, I don’t like Hu at all. In my opinion, from Hu, Zhao to Jiang, then to Hu, the Chinese society has been going backward for the past two decades, with each replacement of the rulers representing each step of “great leap backward”. But I simply cannot tolerate your illiterate and idiotic “reasoning”. That’s all.
作者:芦笛 在 罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org |
|
|