kingsmill
性别: 
加入时间: 2011/10/16 文章: 253
经验值: 8523
|
|
|
作者:kingsmill 在 驴鸣镇 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org
如果您说的是加拿大人Bacque搞出来的那个“一百万德俘死亡论”,那可是很扯淡的。而且这个论点是上过英国电视,BBC还做过纪录片。东线的德军战俘确实是大规模的死掉了,但西线的情况不同。
美国统计的战俘营内死亡人数是15,000人左右,德国红十字会统计的失踪人数是41,000人左右,这两个数字加起来也不过56,000。西德政府曾成立专门委员会对德国二战战俘情况进行研究统计。对前后关押过560,000名战俘的6个条件最坏死亡率最高的西方国家战俘营的调查结果显示,死亡人数在3,000-9,000之间。
下附链接是著名的军事作家,战史研究者Stephen Ambrose对此论的批评,Ambrose是《兄弟连》的著者。
http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/b/bacque-james/ambrose-001.html
引一点Ambrose的结语:
“Mr. Bacque makes a point that is irrefutable: some American G.I.'s and their officers were capable of acting in almost as brutal a manner as the Nazis. We did not have a monopoly on virtue. He has challenged us to reopen the question, to do the research required, to get at the full truth. For that contribution, he deserves thanks. But as to how he presented his discovery, I turn again to Albert Cowdrey: "Surely the author has reason to be satisfied with his achievement. He has no reputation as a historian to lose, and "Other Losses" can only enhance his standing as a writer of fiction." ”
这个论点换个名字换几个词,也可以拿来形容那位“斯大林先发制人论”的Rezun (AKA Suvorov)
作者:kingsmill 在 驴鸣镇 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org |
|
|