海纳百川

登录 | 登录并检查站内短信 | 个人设置 网站首页 |  论坛首页 |  博客 |  搜索 |  收藏夹 |  帮助 |  团队  | 注册  | RSS
主题: 弱弱地问师爷和各位达人:那个古老的问题
回复主题   printer-friendly view    海纳百川首页 -> 驴鸣镇
阅读上一个主题 :: 阅读下一个主题  
作者 弱弱地问师爷和各位达人:那个古老的问题   
所跟贴 老舅,我看不懂你的中文。另外,我猜光纤的尺度离量子效应还差了N个数量级。 -- 小小衲 - (10054 Byte) 2009-10-11 周日, 上午10:53 (267 reads)
xilihutu
[个人文集]

论坛管理员


性别: 性别:男

加入时间: 2007/03/29
文章: 9277
来自: 美国
经验值: 298820


文章标题: 再看(修改了),另外附 Feynman 尺度 (214 reads)      时间: 2009-10-11 周日, 上午11:21

作者:xilihutu驴鸣镇 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org

page 84-85

When we look at photons on a large scale -- much larger than the distance required for one stopwatch turn -- the phenomena that we see are very approximated by rules such as "light travels in straight lines," because there are enough paths around the path of minimum time to reinforce each other, and enough other paths to cancel each other out. But when the space though which a photon moves becomes too small (such as the tiny holes in the screen), these rules fail -- we discover that light doesn't have to go in straight lines, there are interference created by two holes, and so on. The same situation exists with electrons: when seen on a large scale, they travel like particles, on definite paths. But on a small scale, such as inside n atom, the space is so small that there is no main path, no "orbit"; there are all sorts of ways the electron could go, each with an amplitude. The phenomenon of interference becomes very important, and we have to sun the arrows to predict where an electron is likely to be.
......

不用去关心什么 stopwatch 和 arrows, 那些东西用在书里的 试验中。

作者:xilihutu驴鸣镇 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org

_________________
是你对还是我right?
返回顶端
阅读会员资料 xilihutu离线  发送站内短信 发送电子邮件
显示文章:     
回复主题   printer-friendly view    海纳百川首页 -> 驴鸣镇 所有的时间均为 北京时间


 
论坛转跳:   
不能在本论坛发表新主题
不能在本论坛回复主题
不能在本论坛编辑自己的文章
不能在本论坛删除自己的文章
不能在本论坛发表投票
不能在这个论坛添加附件
可以在这个论坛下载文件


based on phpbb, All rights reserved.
[ Page generation time: 0.724998 seconds ] :: [ 24 queries excuted ] :: [ GZIP compression enabled ]