海纳百川

登录 | 登录并检查站内短信 | 个人设置 网站首页 |  论坛首页 |  博客 |  搜索 |  收藏夹 |  帮助 |  团队  | 注册  | RSS
主题: 芦笛我看到了你的“艺术作品”了,并给你留下了贴切的评论
回复主题   printer-friendly view    海纳百川首页 -> 罕见奇谈
阅读上一个主题 :: 阅读下一个主题  
作者 芦笛我看到了你的“艺术作品”了,并给你留下了贴切的评论   
所跟贴 芦笛我看到了你的“艺术作品”了,并给你留下了贴切的评论 -- 青菜 - (77 Byte) 2007-9-29 周六, 上午4:14 (469 reads)
芦笛
[博客]
[个人文集]

论坛管理员




加入时间: 2004/02/14
文章: 31805

经验值: 519217


文章标题: Hehe, so much for "professional"! (151 reads)      时间: 2007-9-29 周六, 下午10:39

作者:芦笛罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org

You have exposed what kind of idiot you really are. You sounded as if photography works were scientific results and cannot be processed or polished. Such a conviction is as stupid and ignorant as mistaking science fiction for scientific papers.

Now let me give you some essential lectures so that next time when you pretend to know something about art, you could do it more decently:

Number 1: What is art? Art is artifact


all the photography pieces, masterpieces included, need to be edited. Before digital camera was invented, this was done by special technique called "dark room editing" (an fang jia gong). By changing exposure time and other factors, people could produce all sorts of special effects they wanted. This was taken over by computer software. Now you are telling everyone this is cheating! Please spare me of my residual teeth, you illiterate idiot!

Number 2, any idiot would see through that I did not do fandamental editing with those pictures you are attacking me with. All I did was to resize the pictures otherwise I could never post them up. The reason was

作者:芦笛罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org
返回顶端
阅读会员资料 芦笛离线  发送站内短信
显示文章:     
回复主题   printer-friendly view    海纳百川首页 -> 罕见奇谈 所有的时间均为 北京时间


 
论坛转跳:   
不能在本论坛发表新主题
不能在本论坛回复主题
不能在本论坛编辑自己的文章
不能在本论坛删除自己的文章
不能在本论坛发表投票
不能在这个论坛添加附件
不能在这个论坛下载文件


based on phpbb, All rights reserved.
[ Page generation time: 0.088967 seconds ] :: [ 23 queries excuted ] :: [ GZIP compression enabled ]