海纳百川

登录 | 登录并检查站内短信 | 个人设置 网站首页 |  论坛首页 |  博客 |  搜索 |  收藏夹 |  帮助 |  团队  | 注册  | RSS
主题: 质疑芦笛的毛泽东研究
回复主题   printer-friendly view    海纳百川首页 -> 罕见奇谈
阅读上一个主题 :: 阅读下一个主题  
作者 质疑芦笛的毛泽东研究   
所跟贴 你的这个想法比芦笛提到的那个析毛例子的错误更严重!如果老芦评毛的系列文 -- 金湖 - (48 Byte) 2007-8-25 周六, 上午1:20 (209 reads)
唐好色
[个人文集]






加入时间: 2006/03/20
文章: 3893

经验值: 67892


文章标题: Pop psycho babbling. (167 reads)      时间: 2007-8-25 周六, 上午5:51

作者:唐好色罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org

This has already been done before and tiresome, I mean pop psychoanalyzing evil people such as Hitler: Hitler killed 6 million Jews because his father was strict and his mother spanked him as a baby. Gee whiz, only if he had more love, he may not have done it. I am sure that makes the victims feel much better.

Now it has been applied to Mao. Granted my above comment is not completely fair and this is not the only point he made in his essays, but it also adds nothing and it trivializes the magnitude of the evil committed.

Millions of kids grow up in strict family and getting spanked regularly. Most turn out fine. Everyone has met intellectual snobs in college and most get over it quickly. I think Mao at least had enough intelligence to act magnanimously toward them. For one thing, it is far more satisfying.

作者:唐好色罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org
返回顶端
阅读会员资料 唐好色离线  发送站内短信
    显示文章:     
    回复主题   printer-friendly view    海纳百川首页 -> 罕见奇谈 所有的时间均为 北京时间


     
    论坛转跳:   
    不能在本论坛发表新主题
    不能在本论坛回复主题
    不能在本论坛编辑自己的文章
    不能在本论坛删除自己的文章
    不能在本论坛发表投票
    不能在这个论坛添加附件
    不能在这个论坛下载文件


    based on phpbb, All rights reserved.
    [ Page generation time: 0.093926 seconds ] :: [ 23 queries excuted ] :: [ GZIP compression enabled ]