1. 首先必须承认,由于行文仓卒,没时间更新全部资料,没察觉University of Wisconsin发表的声明;我承认这是无心之失,但不是故意误导。Kevin Barrett被议员点名批评,以及有谣传指University of Wisconsin涉嫌干预学术自由,都是不争的事实。University of Wisconsin最后作出明智决定保留Kevin Barrett的教席,当然值得高兴。但官方企图对学术机构施压,干预学术自由,却让人感到遗憾。不足一星期前,University of New Hampshire又再发生类似事件,足证我指政府有意针对异见人士,完全有事实根据,不是胡乱编造出来的指控。(参考文章来自学术刊物“Inside Higher Ed”,文章开宗明义便清楚指出:“The University of New Hampshire is refusing to fire a tenured professor whose views on 9/11 have led many politicians in the state to demand his dismissal.”)http://insidehighered.com/news/2006/08/29/woodward