|
| 阅读上一个主题 :: 阅读下一个主题 |
| 作者 |
 空爷：Is the "Israel lobby" distorting America's Mide |
 |
| 所跟贴 |
我还听过一说:沙特 -- 消极 - (56 Byte) 2006-4-23 周日, 上午9:50 (278 reads) |
Imbecile
[博客]
[个人文集]
游客
|
|
|
作者：Anonymous 在 罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org
interested in this:
We're all gonna die.
March 29th, 2006 (1 views)
We're all gonna die.
First, we know that man is mortal and we will all have our ticket punched some day.
Second, we know that the universe will some day become a mass of undifferentiated energy, a void of lazy, placid molecules, or even a state where the laws of physics have been deemed irrelevant.
Even given these two facts, I'm in no hurry to accelerate the end. This week's edition of Time Magazine reminds us that we better quit screwing around.
For years, the debate over global warming has raged. Real or fake? Serious or passing? Imminent or years away?
The debate is over, but no one seems to have told the public. It seems as if this week's Time is trying to catch us all up, and I, for one, am on board.
We didn't so much approach the edge of the cliff as hurled drunkenly towards it while flipping off those stupid scientists who tried to tell us to slow down. Killjoys.
Hurricanes are getting bigger, shorelines are eroding, and species are dying.
We can probably fix it. We had better fix it. With some serious human ingenuity, we can stabilize the increase of carbon dioxide and minimize the climate change. Then we can work toward slowly bringing it down.
The assumption has been all along that by the time things got serious, technology would have made fossil fuels irrelevant and we'd be able to continue with our energy-sucking lifestyles. As of right now, climate change is just short of the finish line, an arrogant hare stopped and taunting our alternative fuel tortoises. Slow and steady may win the race, but are we comfortable betting our very existence on it?
This is no longer a whiny hippie issue. I hate those guys as much as anyone. If anyone tries to paint this issue as such, I hereby give all my readers permission to kick them square in the nuts. This may be extreme, but we cannot afford to let this turn into a debate. In any political debate, people will polarize around two options, regardless of how insipid and ridiculous one of the ideas are.
If you ask 100 people if they think baby-dropping should be an Olympic sport, then 99 will say no. If you ask 100 people if they would like to join the pro-babydropping club or the anti-babydropping club, they will probably split 50-50. Given this basic aspect of human nature, I believe the nut-kicking is completely reasonable.
It sure beats the alternative…
作者：Anonymous 在 罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org |
|
|
| 返回顶端 |
|
 |
| |
|
|
您不能在本论坛发表新主题
您不能在本论坛回复主题
您不能在本论坛编辑自己的文章
您不能在本论坛删除自己的文章
您不能在本论坛发表投票
您不能在这个论坛添加附件
您不能在这个论坛下载文件
|
based on phpbb, All rights reserved.
|
