海纳百川

登录 | 登录并检查站内短信 | 个人设置 网站首页 |  论坛首页 |  博客 |  搜索 |  收藏夹 |  帮助 |  团队  | 注册  | RSS
主题: 再论马克思主义的历史罪恶
回复主题   printer-friendly view    海纳百川首页 -> 罕见奇谈
阅读上一个主题 :: 阅读下一个主题  
作者 再论马克思主义的历史罪恶   
所跟贴 写稿挣稿费算不算替报社打工?老马定义"工人阶级"单指体力劳动者吗? -- Anonymous - (30 Byte) 2003-1-27 周一, 上午7:15 (184 reads)
ouyan






加入时间: 2004/02/14
文章: 152

经验值: 304


文章标题: Could you give Marx's original definition here ? (179 reads)      时间: 2003-1-27 周一, 下午3:44

作者:ouyan罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org

Not many people have the heart/patience to bore into his bloody books nowaydays any more.

It seems to me that those you mentioned can be defined by conventional way as the middle class, rather than as the proletariat. The latter, by dictionary entries, are "wage earners collectivelly, esp. those without capital and dependent on selling their labor". A laborer is a person doing unskilled, usually manual work, for wages.



I do not think these trivial things would lead us anywhere. The common sense is that if a theory cannot be verified by a single practical event, it is worthless, even academically.

作者:ouyan罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org
返回顶端
阅读会员资料 ouyan离线  发送站内短信
    显示文章:     
    回复主题   printer-friendly view    海纳百川首页 -> 罕见奇谈 所有的时间均为 北京时间


     
    论坛转跳:   
    不能在本论坛发表新主题
    不能在本论坛回复主题
    不能在本论坛编辑自己的文章
    不能在本论坛删除自己的文章
    不能在本论坛发表投票
    不能在这个论坛添加附件
    不能在这个论坛下载文件


    based on phpbb, All rights reserved.
    [ Page generation time: 0.042428 seconds ] :: [ 23 queries excuted ] :: [ GZIP compression enabled ]