海纳百川

登录 | 登录并检查站内短信 | 个人设置 网站首页 |  论坛首页 |  博客 |  搜索 |  收藏夹 |  帮助 |  团队  | 注册  | RSS
主题: 以西方的标准:“香港某教授”比张维迎更适合当院长?  [云淡水暖]
回复主题   printer-friendly view    海纳百川首页 -> 罕见奇谈
阅读上一个主题 :: 阅读下一个主题  
作者 以西方的标准:“香港某教授”比张维迎更适合当院长?  [云淡水暖]   
什麽
[博客]
[个人文集]

游客









文章标题: 以西方的标准:“香港某教授”比张维迎更适合当院长?  [云淡水暖] (289 reads)      时间: 2004-10-22 周五, 上午8:43

作者:Anonymous罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org


以西方的标准:“香港某教授”比张维迎更适合当院长?


北大经济学院院长张维迎教授前段时间有点挂不住了,可能因为被平民舆论骂烦了,尽管还是满腔的清高,但话语间还是可以感受到火气不小,比如;

一方面表达了对大众话语的不屑“一个学者的独立性,不只是指要独立于政府的意识形态,个别利益集团的利益,还包括你要独立于大众的情绪化的东西。这后一点更难做到,我们知道,历史上不少伟大的学者正是被公众舆论扼杀掉的。…只为迎合大众的流行舆论而讲话,那他就已经丧失了学者的独立性,也丧失了基本的学术良知。这样的学者在西方学术界是被人所不齿的。而在我们这里,却常常被认为是有’良知’的学者,这是非常可悲的事情。”(《经济观察报》),大众的东西“情绪化”,张教授们要反“扼杀”而成为“伟大的学者”,“迎合”大众情绪就是“丧失了基本的学术良知”,怪不得视大众为无物。

一方面表白了自己的学术道德、人格素养,重要的还有“公信力”“一个学者要有公信力,首先得有良好的个人品德,其次要有严谨的学术态度。我一直认为,学者首先应该修身养性,是一个道德观念很强的人,至少对人文社会科学是这样,因为他的言行会对社会、对公众产生影响,这种影响可能是正的,也可能是负的。作为人文社会科学的学者,做人的品质的要求是很高的。…象我们这些人,20多年来的命运一直就跟改革搅和在一起,我们知道这个国家的问题在那里,我们同样知道这些问题需要积极的改革来解决。我们批评政府,批评行政权力干预经济,批评企业家”(《北京青年周刊》)俨然一副改革先驱的架势,当然,我想知道,张维迎教授所“批评”的企业家,包括不包括他担任了独立董事、顾问的、收取了丰厚报酬的那些企业家们?

最主要的方面,是对“无耻之人”进行了严词责骂“如果一个人在生活中的一些小事上都没有基本德行,连偷鸡摸狗的事他都能干的出,他怎么会成为有社会良知和社会责任心的人?…作为人文社会科学的学者,如果你在做人的基本道德上是为人所不齿的,如果没有基本的科学精神,我们历来认为是不值得认真对待的。…做为学者,我们更在乎同行的评价。在学术界,有些规则大家都是了解的,而你什么样的人,我们也都是了解的,国内外经济学术界的沟通很多,其实大部分民众,他们也将会更加成熟,当他们发现了解某些人在学术界缺乏基本的公信力、为人所不齿的时候,难道不会改变自己的想法?…难道一个无赖一个疯子往你脸上扔块泥巴,你就一辈子都不美了么?不过这也提醒我们学术界,需要净化学术空气,不能让江湖郎中乱搅和。”(《北京青年周刊》)骂得好不痛快,“偷鸡摸狗”、“一个无赖一个疯子”、“做人的基本道德上是为人所不齿的”,那“无耻之人”是谁,张教授比较“优雅”地回避了,但不难想象,因为记者一再追问着“香港某学者”,按下不表。

以张教授之尊,必然有过人之处,“一个学者要有公信力,首先得有良好的个人品德,其次要有严谨的学术态度。”,标准是什么呢,显然不是大众舆论的认同,那个太俗、太“低级”,张教授说啦“我的感觉是,至少在经济学界,我更受人尊重。我刚才说了,你去香港、台湾、美国调查一圈下来,就十分明白了。一个社会对于一位学者的公信力要足够重视,否则有可能对社会带来极大的伤害。”,再参考“这样的学者在西方学术界是被人所不齿的。”,我有点明白了。

张教授们的“公信力”,是要建立在“去香港、台湾、美国调查一圈下来”,然后以“在西方学术界”是被人所“齿”,还是“被人所不齿的”为尺度量一下。总之,在中国经济学界的“高端”,是要以西方的“齿”为基准,判定学术的、道德的“公信力”。

我不懂经济学,也对中高级经济学和中国特色的社会主义经济,为什么非要以西方为“齿”的做法很不理解,如果如是,还有什么“中国特色的社会主义经济理论”?那么,进一步考究下去,“在西方学术界”是被人所“齿”的标准是什么呢?按照西方学术界的规矩,应该是学术成果,经济学的学术成果,好像应该体现为在西方“一流”的专业杂志上发表的论文数目,当然,这是西方的标准,不是中国大众社会的标准,既然如此,我们可以比较一下张维迎教授和“香港某教授”的学术造诣。

前几天,水木清华网站上,有好事者搜集了一点资料贴出来,是关于张维迎教授和“香港某教授”在西方刊物上发表的论文篇目,据说,国际公认的经济类一流刊物有四种,金融类两种:Journal of Finance、Journal of Financial Economics;经济类两种:American Economic Review、Journal of Political Economy。

张维迎教授的篇目如下:

http://www.gsm.pku.edu.cn/gsm.nsf/index?OpenForm&ProgramName=1A0002002
001730178&Page=1&CSiteTemp=1

Zhang Weiying, 1990, "Theoretical questions concerning macroeconomic
balance and macroeconomic control" (with Song Guoqing), Chinese
Economic Studies, Vol.23, No.3, 1990, USA.

Zhang Weiying, 1989, “On the Line of Thoughts in Price Reform Guided
chiefly by the Notion of Letting Go’”, Chinese Economic Studies,
Spring 1989, 22(3), pp.50-66, USA.

Zhang, Weiying, 1997, “Decision Rights, Residual Claim and Performance:
A theory of How China’s State Enterprise Reform Worksote , China
Economic Review. Vol.8 (no.1): 67-82, JAL Press.

Zhang, Weiying, 1998, “A principal-agent Theory of the Public Economy
and Its Application to China”, Economics of Planning, Vol.31: 231-251.


Zhang, Weiying, 1998, “Cross-regional competition and Privatization
in China ”, MOST-MOCT: Economic Policy in transitional Economics.

Zhang, Weiying, 1998, “Optimal Assignment of Principalship in Teamsh”
(with Shuhe Li), forthcoming, Journal of Economic Behavior and
Organization.

Zhang, Weiying, 2000, “The Road to Capitalism: Competition and
Institutional Change in China” (with Shaomin Li and Shuhe Li),
Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 28 (No.2): 269-292.

Zhang, Weiying, 2000, “Why Entrepreneurs Are Liquidity-Constrained? ”,
Annals of Economics and Finance, Forthcoming, Vol. 1 (No.1).

Zhang, Weiying, 2000, “China’s SOE Reform: A Corporate Governance
Perspective”, the Current Politics and Economics of China, forthcoming.

按照标准,张教授9篇论文中没有一篇进入“一流”刊物。

“香港某教授”的篇目如下:

http://www.ceibs.edu/forum/2002/0511_lang_cv.html

●"An Empirical Test of the Impact of Managerial Self Interest on
Corporate Capital Structure," (with I. Friend), Journal of Finance 43,
1988, p271-281.

"The Size Effect of Stock Returns: Is It Simply A Risk Factor Not
Adequately Reflected by the Usual Risk Measures?" (with I. Friend),
Journal of Banking and Finance 12, 1988, p13-30.

●"Dividend Announcements: Cash Flow Signalling vs. Free Cash Flow
Hypotheses,"
(with R. Litzenberger), Journal of Financial Economics 24, 1989,
p181-191.

●"Managerial Performance, Tobin's Q and Successful Tender Offers,"
(with R.
Stulz and R. Walkling), Journal of Financial Economics 24, 1989,
p137-154.

●"Troubled Debt Restructuring: An Empirical Study of Private
Reorganization of Firms in Default," (with S. Gilson and K. John),
Journal of Financial Economics 27, 1990, p315-353.

"The Forecast Accuracy of Individual Analysts: Evidence of Systematic
Optimism and Pessimism," (with K. Butler), Journal of Accounting
Research 29, 1991, p150-156.

●"Insider Trading Around Dividend Announcements: Theory and Evidence,"
(with K.
John), Journal of Finance 46, 1991, p1361-1390.

●"A Test of the Free Cash Flow Hypothesis: The Case of Bidder Returns,"
(with R. Stulz and R. Walkling), Journal of Financial Economics 29,
1991, p315-335.

●"Testing Financial Market Equilibrium under Asymmetric Information,"
(with R.
Litzenberger and V. Madrigal), Journal of Political Economy 100, 1992,
p317-348.

●"Contagion and Competition Intra-Industry Effects of Bankruptcy
Announcements:
An Empirical Analysis," (with R. Stulz), Journal of Financial
Economics 32, 1992, p45-60.

●"Voluntary Restructuring of Large Firms in Response to Performance
Decline,"
(with K. John and J. Netter), Journal of Finance 47, 1992, p891-917.

●"Tobin's q, Corporate Diversification and Firm Performance," (with R.
Stulz), Journal of Political Economy 102, 1994, p1248-1280.

●"Asset Sales, Firm Performance and the Agency Costs of Managerial
Discretion,"
(with A. Poulsen and R. Stulz), Journal of Financial Economics 37, 1995,
p3-38.

●"Leverage, Investment and Firm Growth," (with E. Ofek and R. Stulz),
Journal of Financial Economics 40, 1996, p3-29.

●"Does Money Explain Asset Returns? Theory and Evidence," (with K.C.
Chan and S. Foresi), Journal of Finance 51, 1996, p345-361.

"Common Volatility in the Industrial Structure of Global Capital
Markets,"
(with B. Arshanapalli and J. Doukas), Journal of International Money
and Finance 16, 1997, 189-209.

"Determinants of Interest Rate Swap Spreads," (with R. Litzenberger
and A.
Liu), Journal Banking and Finance 22, 1998, 1507-1532.

"The Pricing of Currency Risk in Japan," (with J. Doukas and P. Hall),
Journal Banking and Finance 23, 1999, 1-20.

"The Measurement of Relatedness: An Application to Corporate
Diversification,"
(with J. Fan), Journal of Business 73, 2000, 629-660.

●"Separation of Ownership from Control of East Asian Firms", (with S.
Claessens and S. Djankov), Journal of Financial Economics 58, 2000,
81-112.

●"Expropriation and Dividends" (with M. Faccio and L. Young), American
Economic Review 91, 2001, 1-25.

●"Disentangling the Incentive and Entrenchment Effects of Large
Shareholdings (with S. Claessens, S. Djankov and J. Fan), forthcoming
in Journal of Finance.

●"The Ultimate Ownership of Western European Corporations," (with M.
Faccio), forthcoming in Journal of Financial Economics.

“香港某教授”22篇有17篇(带●者)进入“一流”刊物。

当然,在经济学这个很倚重于国情的领域,唯西方的马首是瞻,本身是荒唐的,但既然张教授们很看重,我们就顺水推舟比较一下子。比较的结果令人惋惜,在西方的标准下,至少在西方一流经济学刊物的编辑眼里,“香港某教授”似乎更“更受人尊重”,这个 “香港、台湾、美国调查一圈下来”也无出其右,那么,纯粹以西方标准,“香港某教授”是不是有更适合做院长的资格呢?



作者:Anonymous罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org
返回顶端
    显示文章:     
    回复主题   printer-friendly view    海纳百川首页 -> 罕见奇谈 所有的时间均为 北京时间


     
    论坛转跳:   
    不能在本论坛发表新主题
    不能在本论坛回复主题
    不能在本论坛编辑自己的文章
    不能在本论坛删除自己的文章
    不能在本论坛发表投票
    不能在这个论坛添加附件
    不能在这个论坛下载文件


    based on phpbb, All rights reserved.
    [ Page generation time: 0.498525 seconds ] :: [ 22 queries excuted ] :: [ GZIP compression enabled ]