秦戈
加入时间: 2004/02/14
文章: 55
经验值: 245
|
|
|
作者：秦戈 在 罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org
原作者：单蹦儿创作组 于 2008-03-22
【按】这混蛋是驻日本的美国财经作者，一贯亲日反华，恨不得台独明天就独立。他刚刚写了一文章，是批评中国西藏平暴的，还跟北京奥运会联系起来。
俺信里说那些“WESTERN ROYALTIES”，是因为他说运动员和各国奥委会们虽然BOYCOTT机会很渺茫，但是VIP政要名人们可以搞一个。还有他对美国不希望台湾民主会“ROCK THE BOAT”表达失望的一句也让俺反讽了，显然丫眼里的民主就是一个亲独的政权在台上不停地“ROCK THE BOAT”,希望看到一个内忧外患不稳定的中国嘛。
＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝
Mr. William Pesek,
I read your article about the link between Beijing Olympics and Tibet riots. I found your outrage ridiculous.
Any person without a deep bias against China would see China government stopped the riots only after rioters exerted horrible violence and vandalism. Innocent Han, Hui, and Tibetan people got killed. Five young girls were burnt to death in a shop. Bank branches, restaurants, shops, vehicles, and buildings were set on fire and looted. The situation got so severe that even the infamous LA riot is nothing compared to the scale of riots in Lhasa. Remind me what the U.S. government did facing the LA riot? Yeah, you are right. It's crackdown. And if that's too distant a memory for you, I think you must remember how the French government crushed riots in France several years ago. No government would allow riots to disturb the social stability and threaten the safety of lives and properties. Please don't impose your double standard. Open your eyes and see what really happened in Tibet.
I can tell you, how the western media responded to the Tibet riot has disillusioned a lot of young people. Some young people, like myself 10 years ago, thought the west must be filled with idealism,democracy,prosperity, and fairness. Well, if I have to put one adjective on how western media has reported the riot ,the only word I can think of is "prejudice". China riot police used the maximum restraint in dealing with the disgusting riots and you guys still call it bloody crackdown of PROTESTERS. In your dictionary, "rioter" and "protester" are obviously 100% interchangeable. Some young men have summarized many reports from western media persons like you. Let me tell you what. CNN covered portions of a picture and made it look like military vehicles were moving in and people were scared away. The covered part is actually a vivid display of many rioters throwing stones at military vehicles. Remind me if there's anything ever happening like that in the U.S. I mean, military vehicles were under the siege of rioters without firing back. It's unimaginable. But it happened in China. What kind of restraint do you guys expect? Let China messed up and the social stability undermined? I do believe lots of you secretly root for that with all your biased reports and comments. Some newspapers pushed bias and smearing to a new level by publishing pictures of Naples police beating demonstrators and indicating they were "Chinese police". Are you kidding me?
On the flip side, this is not necessarily a bad thing for China. It's actually a reminder that some western powers still hold the animosity and bias against China and they won't give China a fair shake, especially when China is stronger and stronger and some of the western world is very anxious about that development from a strategic competitor's perspective. I guess our people need to discover that. This world is not an ideal one yet. It's still to some degree a jungle. And the performance of the western media educated many Chinese people about that cold and hard fact over the past several days.
As to your linking Beijing Olympics to politics, I guess it's a good thing too. As an enthusiastic supporter of Beijing Olympics, I have always hoped that the Olympics game would be a good stage bridging the west and China and making each other better understood. Animosity won't help. Only cultural exchange and open mind will help. But you know what? If the west doesn't want to give up animosity, so be it. It's no big deal. Olympics is just a party. It's an option, but not a necessity. The bottom line is that our sovereignty can't be compromised in any form. These two matters should not even be mentioned in the same sentence. We Chinese people have this consensus: Olympics is nothing compared to our sovereignty and our land. China is big and strong enough to guarantee that.
Seriously, boycott of Olympics, if that ever happens, will only help China. Chinese people will remember how their party is spoiled and hijacked. It's free education how other people try to corner you and make you feel bad when you have nothing other than good will. Strangely, I like that scenario more and more now. Some boycotts from western royalties? So what?! We don't like them any way. They remind me of Opium War. Without them as VIP guests, I'd feel much better. Please stay away. Pleeeeeease.
And your deploring Taiwan's democracy seems to me your deep disappointment that Taiwan might not have a pro-independence leader after the election. Quote: "That's why the U.S. will invade Iraq to foster democracy, while praying that already democratic Taiwan doesn't rock the boat. " End Quote. Obviously you think Taiwan's democracy is healthy only when Taiwan does rock the boat and China is unstable.
You know, I write this letter to you not really trying to persuade you. I'm a financial worker and often read Bloomberg articles. From reading some of your articles, I already learned that you are a pro-Japan and anti-China type. It would be naive for me to try to change your deep-rooted bias. But I want to voice my strong opposition to you just so you know that Chinese people are not insensitive to the ridiculous bias against us. We know we need to improve our economic and political systems. But we'll make sure we won't let those foreign interests with a secret agenda influence us and we won't allow any reforms in price of China sovereignty or national interests. WE'LL PROTECT OUR OWN INTERESTS IN ANY CASE.
A Chinese Bloomberg Reader
William Pesek的文章的链接：
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&sid=aLEQXWQWtbzM&refer=home
作者：秦戈 在 罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org |
|
|
给BLOOMBERG反华专栏作者的一封信
