安魂曲
[个人文集]
加入时间: 2004/02/14
文章: 12787
经验值: 0
|
|
|
作者：安魂曲 在 罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org
MIT画报事件：Prof. Dower is Biased 的一些证据（组图）
| 消息来源：八阕--国际风云 | 八阕编辑：2006-04-27 | 网址：http://???? | | 抄送朋友 | 打印保留 |
八阕 http://???? 【八阕】【八阕】一个劳动人民群众喜闻乐见的好地方:http://????Prof. Dower is Biased 的一些证据：
skydive太牛啦原文：
http://mitbbs.com/mitbbs_article_t.php?board=ChinaNews&gid=5730427&ftype=0
证据一：
"Old" China was the Anti-West, the Anti-Modern （a notion China?ˉs ownCommunist leaders would later embrace with a vengeance themselves）. As aconsequence, while the corpses were unmistakably and brutally Chinese,they stood for a great deal more as well.先把old china骂一通，然后又嘲笑中共。然后，有赞美日本军国主义分子自立自强。
（安魂曲评： 这一段故意断章取义暂且不论，光说中共自己的宣传还把1949年前形容成“人民生活在水深火热之中”的“旧中国”呢，难道人家客观介绍一下满清Old China闭关自守的历史事实就侮辱中国人了么？----至于最后一句，显然介绍的是当时日本画家自己的想法）
From the Japanese perspective, the denigration of the Chinese thatpermeates the Sino-Japanese War prints was really secondary to theobverse side of this triumphal new nationalism. It was secondary, thatis, to the story of the surpassing discipline and self-sacrifice ofJapanese from every level of society. That is why many of the mostmemorable war prints do not depict the enemy at all, but rather focus onthe Japanese alone. Sometimes they are simply battling raw nature（the fierce blizzards and turbulent seas）, sometimes simply shown incontrol of the powerful machinery of modern warfare. Always there is acelebration of brave men engaged in a noble mission?athrowing themselvesagainst an ominous, threatening, but also thrillingly challenging andalluring world.
（安魂曲评： 开头就说得很清楚么：From the Japanese perspective----这画展根本是日本画家的画展，当然只好单提“从日本人的角度看”，否则不是多此一举？）
证据二:
再看这段：
那个清兵斩首图，对日本人屠杀的行为只有一个没有褒贬色彩的词“frightful”。----有一个字对这种暴行的谴责吗？有的只是洋洋得意的转述，用的都是赞美的字眼：benevolence， civilized，
heroic。中国人：barbarity, violent, rebellious.也没有任何对这种歪曲事实的军国主义宣传的谴责。
Kokunimasa offered a harsh “Illustration of the Decapitation of ViolentChinese Soldiers” that included a lengthy in????ion. The benevolenceand justice of the Japanese army, this text explained, equaled and evensurpassed that of the civilized Western nations. By contrast, thebarbarity of the Chinese was such that some prisoners attacked theirguards. As a warning, the Japanese—as depicted in the print—hadbeheaded as many as thirty-eight rebellious prisoners in front ofother captured Chinese. The Rising Sun military flag still flutteredin one panel of Kokunimasa’s print; the stalwart cavalry officerstill surveyed the scene; the ????utioner still struck the familiarheroic pose with upraised sword. The subject itself, however, andsevered heads on the ground, made this an unusually frightful scene.
（安魂曲评： 又是典型的不懂英文在那里胡说八道----原文中所有提及日本benevolence和civilized的地方，都清清楚楚说明“this text explained”，也就是说原画上面的文字所说。。。倒是Frightful这个词确确实实是英文说明者自己加上的-----其实根据日本原画的文字，日本军队的文明和公正，甚至超过了整个西方文明国家。。。难道这是英文说明者在侮辱西方文化么？）
证据三：
再补充：
整个Old China, New Japan长长的3300个词的介绍，注释中，只有这一句话貌似谴责了日本：
This poisonous seed, already planted in violence in 1894-95, would burstinto full atrocious flower four decades later, when the emperor?ˉssoldiers and sailors once again launched war against China.
就算这句话，也只是说变相的种族主义导致了战争，没有任何对日本战争暴行本身的谴责。
（安魂曲评：别人搞一次学术展示而已，既不是分析历史更不是上政治课，有什么义务非要对日本一百多年前的“战争暴行”进行谴责呢？----其实对西方教授而言，能在这里专门指出日本画作中反映资本人种族自大的This poisonous seed，以及日本“再一次”launched war against China的事实，这本身已经足够对得起中国人了。。。难道中国愤青们非要强迫对MIT艺术教授们写一段画展说明也非要和大陆教科书一样“谴责日本军国主义长期以来对中国的侵略”不可么？！）
作者：安魂曲 在 罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org |
|
|
搞了半天，抗议的中国愤青连基本英文阅读都没过关就在那里胡搅蛮缠！^-^
