|
| 阅读上一个主题 :: 阅读下一个主题 |
| 作者 |
 我给贺文先生的信 |
 |
芦笛
[博客]
[个人文集]
论坛管理员
.gif)
加入时间: 2004/02/14
文章: 31803
经验值: 519161
|
|
|
作者：芦笛 在 罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org
我给贺文先生的信
芦笛
原文为英文，附在后面，翻译如下：
贺先生：
谢谢来信。对不起，您错过了（如果不是刻意规避了）我的主要请求。现在你既然已经介入了这项公众事务，您就得责无旁贷地站出来，把您在私人场合里和我讲的话告诉公众。鉴于您难于上网，我能否请求您的书面授权把您的来信贴到论坛里？请再读一次您的来信，将您认为不适于披露给大众的话删去，再寄回给我，我再贴到坛子里去。
像您这样一个长期生活在文明世界人人，竟然对什么是stalking一无所知，我对此至感震惊。先生，请允许我现在就告诉您，这并不是您想像的是什么更严格的道德要求，而是每个公民必须遵守的义务。它也不是什么向政府抗议示威，因为马悲鸣并非总统！发生在公众场合也并不使得它不再是一种罪行。
例如你爱上了某人，但无机会接近她，于是便设法在公众场合与她相遇，向她献花，和她搭讪，请她吃饭，等等。如果这种追求不受对方欢迎，而她也告诉了你这点，但你还要持续追求人家，这就足以构成stalking了。如果她愿意，完全可以到法庭去告你，而你就将因此受到惩罚。
反过来也如此。如果你对某人怀恨在心，为复仇在公众场合持续败坏人家的名誉，那也是犯下了stalking。这儿最重要的证据是你有具体的复仇动机。有趣的是，马悲鸣多次承认他诋毁郑义完全是出于私仇。马没有被告上法庭，全靠郑义是个文明盲，和你以及马悲鸣一模一样。有时我怀疑大陆人到底能否从他们居住的社会中学到任何文明知识，唉。
既然您没有stalking这个概念，那我原谅您。但请问您是否知道什么是捏造？您刚刚抱怨了青菜造谣，不知您是否设身处地地想过那些被马悲鸣造谣诽谤的受害人的感觉如何？在前信中，我已经向您出示了他造谣诽谤他人的足够例子。对此您会怎样做？是否会站出来并谴责他这种下流行为，还是继续认为他是个体面绅士？如果您想赢得我的尊重，现在就请表明您的一重道德标准吧。
先生，我不是容易被好话糊弄住的人。至今我还没有发现我为何必须尊重您。我的确相信您的存在，但正如我在前信中说过的那样，马悲鸣的证词动摇了我原来的信念。如我所说，他间接承认了化名批驳自己。在这种情况下，我能找到的唯一符合逻辑的解释，就是他被郑义捉住后，找上了您来为他圆谎。而因为您是他的好友，您也就同意了。因为您重视友谊超过正义，所以您现在拒绝面对马不仅以最恶劣的方式stalk郑义，而且还通过在公众场合造谣诬蔑诽谤了许多其他无辜的人的现实。
所以，先生，请您向我们展示一下您的美德，回答我在那些文章中提出的问题，向大众解释马为何要承认他几乎被郑义说服了。如果他真像您说的那样无辜，那么谁也无法明白这些话，遑论他最近的声称“郑义说得有鼻子有眼的，我都快不相信自己了”乃是什么“虚拟语气”！在您作出可信解释之前，我别无选择，只能认为您是个伪证者。
因为此信是我自己写的，且未泄露任何私人信息，我将把它贴在论坛里。希望您不会介意，祝您今日快乐。
几乎忘记说，我很抱歉不能把自己的电话号码告诉您，因为我并不认为您是一位诚实的公民，至少在现阶段不这么认为。我希望您能原谅我这种再自然不过的感觉，并盼望您能早日勇敢地证明您的道德完整。
您诚挚的，
芦笛
－－－－－－－－
【附录】原信
Hi, Mr He,
Thanks for your letter and I am sorry that you have missed, if not evaded deliberately, my main request. Now that you got yourself involved in this public issue, it has become your inescapable obligation to stand out and tell the public what you have told me in private. In view of your difficulty in accessing the web, can you please give me the permit to post your letter up to the forum? Please read your letter again and delete whatever you deem inappropriate for the public to know, then send it back to me and I will post it up.
I am quite surprised that being a man in the civilized world for such a long time, you still have not the faintest idea of what stalking is. Let me tell you straight away, sir, it is NOT a stricter moral demand as you assumed. Rather, it is a citizen's obligation that everyone should obey. Neither is it something like demonstrating against the government because MBM is NOT the President! Taking place in public places does not exempt it from a crime, either.
For example, if you fall for someone, but you have no opportunity to approach her. Then you try to meet her in public places to give her flowers, talk to her, invite her to dinner etc. If such advancements are not welcome and she has told you so, yet you still carry on, then this will be enough to form stalking. If she likes, she can take this issue to the court, and you will be punished.
The other way round is also true. If you resent someone and take revenge by defaming him or her in public places persistently, then you also commit stalking. Here the most important evidence is that you have a concrete motive for revenge. Funny enough, MBM himself has admitted many, many times that he decries Zheng Yi out of pure personal grudge. Lucky for MBM he is not sued, simply because Zheng Yi is illiterate to civilization, exactly as you and MBM are. Sometimes I wonder if the Mainlanders can ever learn anything civilized from the society they are now living in, alas.
OK, so you do not have this concept, I forgive you for that matter. But do you understand what is called fabrication? You just complained about Qingcai's fabrication. But have you ever considered the feelings of the victims of MBM's fabrications? I have shown you enough examples of his obscene fabrications in my previous letters. What are you going to do about them? Are you going to stand out and condemn MBM for his disgusting behavior or do you still consider him a decent gentleman? Show me your single moral standard, if you want me to respect you.
Sir, I am not a person to be bought easily by sweet words. So far I have not found any reason to respect you yet. I do believe your existence, but, as I said in my previous letters, what MBM said has shaken my previous belief. As I said, he had admitted indirectly that he had criticized himself using a pseudo name. In this situation, the only logical explanation I can find is that after he had been caught by Zheng Yi, he picked you up to maintain the lie and you agreed to do so, because he is your close friend. As you place friendship before justice, now you are refusing to face the reality that he not only stalked Zheng Yi in the worst way, but also libeled so many other innocent people by fabricating them publicly.
So please, sir, show us some decent personality. Answer the questions I raised in my articles and explain to the public why MBM had to admit he had almost been persuaded by Zheng Yi and why he was and still is so eager to get his letter back. No one can understand these words if he was really innocent as you claim, or his latest claim that "As Zheng Yi sounded so persuasive, I nearly lost my belief in myself" was "subjunctive mood"!. Before you have given us a plausible explanation, sir, I have no choice but to regard you as a perjurer.
As this letter is from me and and reveals no private information, I will post it up onto the forum. Hope you will not object. I wish you a good day.
Almost forgot to say, I am sorry I cannot give you my telephone number because I do not consider you an honest citizen, at least not yet at this stage. I hope you would forgive me for such most natural feelings and I do look forward to seeing you prove your integrity most bravely.
Sincerely yours,
Ludi
作者：芦笛 在 罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org |
|
|
| 返回顶端 |
|
 |
| |
|
|
您不能在本论坛发表新主题
您不能在本论坛回复主题
您不能在本论坛编辑自己的文章
您不能在本论坛删除自己的文章
您不能在本论坛发表投票
您不能在这个论坛添加附件
您不能在这个论坛下载文件
|
based on phpbb, All rights reserved.
|
