|
| 阅读上一个主题 :: 阅读下一个主题 |
| 作者 |
 Mr. 九戒 and Mr. 牛乐吼, please enter |
 |
芦笛
[博客]
[个人文集]
论坛管理员
.gif)
加入时间: 2004/02/14
文章: 31805
经验值: 519217
|
|
|
作者：芦笛 在 罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org
Mr. 九戒 and Mr. 牛乐吼, please enter
芦笛
Mr. 九戒:
I do not know who you are, but obviously, you did not read my wife's poster in Shuodao, in which she told why she had fallen in love with me. Needless to say, my so-called "talents" helped a lot, as she is a traditional woman. But the real reason was that she was convinced I was a nice guy whom she could entrust with her future. I must say she was too credulous in both respects. To be honest with you, when I was young, I often had dreams like Lao Ma's in which I was a male lion (not a male horse in his dream) with dozens of wives who hunted for me.
Now your question:
{{" So let me make myself clear once again: I never, ever, feel offended if someone points out factual or logical mistakes in my essays. No matter how embarrassing, I always admit my mistakes and thank the other party."
But there is one exception at least: Jin Lu (金录)}}
You put me in the position to reveal confidential information so as to defend myself. All I can say here is the following:
1) The row between Ms Jin and me had nothing to do with my mistakes either in facts or in logic (Correction: "logical mistakes" I used in the poster does not sound right. Maybe I can say "logic mistakes"). She had pestered me for more than half a year with all sorts of stupid criticisms such as I worshiped the West naively just as I worshipped my first love, etc. Although she insulted me more than once (like "cursing the Chinese with more and more craze" etc), I never took offence, as I knew we were of different species. Instead, I wrote a long piece explaining why I had to criticize the Chinese culture etc. The article is still in qiqi.com.
2) The row broke out simply because of the severe paranoia that Ms Jin seemed to be suffering. It started like this: A guy made some remarks following one of her stupid pieces. She mistook that guy for her personal enemy and started to mock that enemy, revealing some private information in the process. I happened to know those two persons involved and was very angry. So much so that I cursed her using foul language such as "e po niang" (savage woman) and asked my "slave" to unleash dogs to bite her, etc. Incredibly, she did not believe me, and thought there was a plot against her that had been cooked up by me, her personal enemy and my friends!
3) So I went back to an internal saloon where we used to chat or paste works for others to criticize. There I posted up a detailed explanation for what had actually happened and strongly suggested that she see a psychiatrist, as she showed severe symptoms of paranoia, imagining that my friends and I had formed a secret group to persecute her. To my knowledge, she said nothing in her defense.
So that is the truth, the whole truth, nothing but the truth. Whether to believe me or not is of course your choice.
But you are right in a sense. Yesterday I said I only retaliated when I was insulted. This was true with my fights with men, but not true with women. I fought with women often because their behaviors disgusted me, or because they were stupid enough to get in the way while I was fighting a famous idiot.
I must admit that in my view, lots of web women are unreasonable. The structures of their brains seem to be so different from ours. And yet they did not realize this fact and were often under the delusion that they could teach me one or two things. Unfortunately, by nature, I am a hopeless intellectual snob and cannot tolerate stupidity. That's why I got my woman-phobia and openly expressed my wish many times that women would stop pasting their remarks following my pieces. But this seems impracticable. So now I decide to completely ignore the inevitable and irritating existence of women in political forums.
The German philosopher Nietzsche said: "Let women go back to their kitchens." I would say: "Let women quit politics and go back to their literature, then we would have some peace."
Mr. 牛乐吼:
I know you are Niu Lehou, as your name has three characters. Also the contents of your poster help.
First of all, allow me to apologize. You are absolutely right, my memory failed me. Sorry for mistaking you for another guy who made a fuss about "sa da te".
Second, let me repeat, thank you for correcting my mistake of mixing up Baker with Shultz.
Third, thank you for pointing out that the meeting was held in Geneva, not in Baghdad. I believe you are right about this matter.
Nonetheless, I wonder why you thought I "fabricate(ed) (the) whole story about going to Baghdad to meet Saddam" deliberately rather than remembered it wrongly. What was my criminal motive here?
Forth, "It was not a secret meeting, whole world knew it. Secretary Baker never regretted about this meeting, even though it was Bush's ieda, he totally shared it."
I do not remember I said it was a secret meeting and denied "(the) whole world knew it". Similarly, I do not remember I said Baker regretted it. Instead, I said Bush wanted him to go so as to appease the American people and show them he has done everything to prevent the war. However, they were rather reluctant as they had decided to go ahead with the war. I do remember a TV program in which Baker recalled that he was rather relieved when Saddam rejected their proposals.
As a matter of fact, you confirmed this: "It was an important measure to win congressional support for the war."
"Soviet did not bring up any peace plan BEFORE the war, but one month AFTER the war started and was rejected by George Bush. It was rather a cease-fire plan."
Here I must say that I could not remember the fact. It seems that you are right because you said with certainty. I must go to the library to have a check. If you prove right, I will of course come back to admit the mistake.
Now here comes the most amusing bit:
"These demonstrate once again how you always cook historic facts to serve your bizarre opinion."
I have a few questions here:
1) Could you please, Mr Niu, give another example to sow how I "always cook historic facts to serve my bizarre opinion"?
2) Have you read the article concerned at all? I said in the beginning that the article was purely based on my memories of the TV programs and newspapers more than 12 years ago and therefore mistakes were inevitable. I then thanked in advance anyone who would point out those mistakes. Have I said those words or not? Have you seen any fabrication with such an introduction?
3) Again, what is my criminal motive to fabricate history facts ( I don't think "historic" is a correct word here)? To serve my bizarre opinion(s) of course. But what is it so bizarre about that particular article? Its main theme was to praise the Bush administration and confirm the war was just, isn't it?
4) Out of curiosity, I just wonder why you hate me so much. With due respect and without exaggeration, sir, I must say it is almost some kind of dark hatred. Why? Because I "always cook historic facts to serve my bizarre opinion"? How could a decent gentleman like you be so upset by my bizarre opinions? After all, there are only opinions, not crimes, aren't they?
"Would you please admit these mistake also? with some sincerity."
I do not know if this piece has shown enough sincerity. One thing I do know, however, is that this is by no means reciprocal. I never expect you to behave the same way. We are simply of different species.
My last advice: stop reading my pieces. It's not good for your health. I present this suggestion with utmost sincerity.
作者：芦笛 在 罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org |
|
|
| 返回顶端 |
|
 |
| |
|
|
您不能在本论坛发表新主题
您不能在本论坛回复主题
您不能在本论坛编辑自己的文章
您不能在本论坛删除自己的文章
您不能在本论坛发表投票
您不能在这个论坛添加附件
您不能在这个论坛下载文件
|
based on phpbb, All rights reserved.
|
