海纳百川

登录 | 登录并检查站内短信 | 个人设置 网站首页 |  论坛首页 |  博客 |  搜索 |  收藏夹 |  帮助 |  团队  | 注册  | RSS
主题: No doubt, Ma Beiming is an idiot
回复主题   printer-friendly view    海纳百川首页 -> 罕见奇谈
阅读上一个主题 :: 阅读下一个主题  
作者 No doubt, Ma Beiming is an idiot   
芦笛
[博客]
[个人文集]

论坛管理员




加入时间: 2004/02/14
文章: 31797

经验值: 518954


文章标题: No doubt, Ma Beiming is an idiot (195 reads)      时间: 2003-3-05 周三, 下午9:30

作者:芦笛罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org



Just kidding. Lao Ma, I have just read your poster thanks to the magic played by 2u2m. Unfortunately, somehow I cannot use cut and paste to quote your words. So I am just making some casual comments here.



First of all, I have not heard Jin's holy doctrine that you quoted with reverence. But I must say this is no big deal to me. If you visit qiqi.com, you will read my piece "Jianshan dai you wenpi chu" (Literary scoundrels emerge generation after generation). I believe you can remember it is a piece that I wrote in our first debate.



In that article, I formulated the writing style nurtured by the commies, into three styles: "ba4 qi4" (authoritarian style), "pi3 qi4" (Literary scoundrel's style) and "dao1 bi3" (framing others with imagined crimes).



In my eyes, your were the perfect representative of the first two styles, and that was why I never liked your writings. I pointed out many times that both of us were suffering from ba qi. The only writer who did not show this style was Lin Siyun (at that time, Qiu Shi had not emerged yet), but unfortunately, he had no clue as to how to think properly.



If you remember my article, there was no need for you to write this new one at all, for ba qi was exactly the authoritarian tone your are so fond of. Go and have a look at your own pieces. Can you name one single piece, which is NOT full of arbitrary assumptions? The best (or the worst, to be more precise) example is your definite conclusion about the casualties the Chinese had suffered during the Anti-Japanese War. I still remember you used the tone "cutting iron and chopping steel" to declare: "At most 2 millions! Couldn't be more! It could never be 40 millions!"



Is there any doubt there, my dear brother?



This is nothing compared to your challenge to the international authority about how many people Stalin has killed. I dare say there will never be another author who has your courage to make the claim: "Stalin only killed 2 million people. The current statistics of 20 million was wrong, simply because the intellectuals could not count!"



Is there any doubt there, my authoritarian brother?



As always, your piece is full of mistakes that it invites me to tear it up. But I have something more important to attend. So I will let you go this time, only to give you a piece of advice: Brother, try to avoid talking about logic, because it does not fit in your brain. For example, you arbitrarily ruled that a political essay can only use deduction, and hence only 3 duan lun (I am sorry, Ranran, I can never remember the word). You are totally mistaken. Go and think it over, alright?



The astonishing thing is that you can never learn this simplest way of deduction. For example, you said,



History does not speak,

Yungu wants Ma Beiming Phenomenon to become history,

So he bans Ma from speaking.



Which part of this 3 duan lun is faulty, brother? Can you work it out?



I am quoting this joke, just in order for you to learn what kind of "quarreling articles" I normally wrote. Unlike you, when I am engaged in debates or fights with others, I focus on the opponent's mistakes in reasoning or in facts. Of course I mock and ridicule the opponent if he is rude, but the main power of my destroying force lies in my iron-like logic and my sharp insight, which has never been paralleled across this damn web. Only on rare occasions when I was really pissed off, did I deviate from this pattern and write something like "The Sketch of the Clowns" or "The Professor in the Class".



What about you, brother? You don't even have the least talent to grasp the art of insulting people! (ma cai) You could either copy some dirty paragraphs from the Romance of the Tree Kingdoms or write nasty junk like "Urging Mme Lu to remarry"! Even though you never used much of your brain to insult people in an original and amusing way as I did, your brain is still wiped out by the junk, so much so that you admit now your brain is full of nasty swear words, nothing else!



How come, brother? How come your brain is so small? Look at me, I am the champion of "web war", and yet, I could compose beautiful poems while I was engaged in a heated fight!



The difference between humans can be greater than that between human and primate. Don't you agree, brother?



作者:芦笛罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org
返回顶端
阅读会员资料 芦笛离线  发送站内短信
显示文章:     
回复主题   printer-friendly view    海纳百川首页 -> 罕见奇谈 所有的时间均为 北京时间


 
论坛转跳:   
不能在本论坛发表新主题
不能在本论坛回复主题
不能在本论坛编辑自己的文章
不能在本论坛删除自己的文章
不能在本论坛发表投票
不能在这个论坛添加附件
不能在这个论坛下载文件


based on phpbb, All rights reserved.
[ Page generation time: 0.619379 seconds ] :: [ 25 queries excuted ] :: [ GZIP compression enabled ]