海纳百川

登录 | 登录并检查站内短信 | 个人设置 网站首页 |  论坛首页 |  博客 |  搜索 |  收藏夹 |  帮助 |  团队  | 注册  | RSS
主题: 黎安友教授对张戎的新书作的书评全文 "Jade and Plastic"
回复主题   printer-friendly view    海纳百川首页 -> 罕见奇谈
阅读上一个主题 :: 阅读下一个主题  
作者 黎安友教授对张戎的新书作的书评全文 "Jade and Plastic"   
所跟贴 一本可笑的充满了作者愤怒感情加偏见的小说,被当成了历史读物,下面这段话是提纲 -- 咱老百姓(真) - (346 Byte) 2005-11-12 周六, 上午6:15 (152 reads)
金星
[博客]
[个人文集]

游客









文章标题: 这是原文!你没有理解这一段的意思?还有,你读了全文没有?特别是结尾! (86 reads)      时间: 2005-11-12 周六, 上午11:27

作者:Anonymous罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org

这篇英文并不难读,你如果读完全文,绝对得不出这样的结论!


There are problems, however: many of their discoveries come from sources that cannot be checked, others are openly speculative or are based on circumstantial evidence, and some are untrue.

这是提出质疑: There are problems, however: .....

............
............

这一段是进一步深化上面所提出的质疑

Of course, anonymous interviews and unpublished sources are often used in reputable China scholarship. They have to be, because of the secrecy imposed by the regime on its own history and workings. I have engaged in such research myself. What is troubling about Mao: The Untold Story is the authors’ failure to give readers any information to help them to evaluate their sources’ reliability. A lengthy research project that denigrates Mao, involving access to many individuals and many remote and secret locations all over China, over a period of many years, and drawing on a significant number of sensitive unpublished sources, in a country where the keys to history are tightly held, legitimately raises questions that the authors should have anticipated and addressed.

How was it possible to gain access? Who gave authorisation or protection, formal or informal, to this project, or if none was given, how was secrecy maintained as the research progressed? How were the interviewees found? In what settings were they interviewed? In what manner were they questioned? How were records of the interviews kept? What motivations did informants have for talking? What methods were used to confirm their identities and to corroborate their information? How were unpublished sources obtained? How were they authenticated? Where, if anywhere, may they be consulted by other scholars (and if they can’t, why not)?






作者:Anonymous罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org
返回顶端
    显示文章:     
    回复主题   printer-friendly view    海纳百川首页 -> 罕见奇谈 所有的时间均为 北京时间


     
    论坛转跳:   
    不能在本论坛发表新主题
    不能在本论坛回复主题
    不能在本论坛编辑自己的文章
    不能在本论坛删除自己的文章
    不能在本论坛发表投票
    不能在这个论坛添加附件
    不能在这个论坛下载文件


    based on phpbb, All rights reserved.
    [ Page generation time: 0.602251 seconds ] :: [ 23 queries excuted ] :: [ GZIP compression enabled ]