|
| 阅读上一个主题 :: 阅读下一个主题 |
| 作者 |
 他们的公平和我们的公平 |
 |
| 所跟贴 |
他们的公平和我们的公平 -- 芦笛 - (3925 Byte) 2005-9-20 周二, 上午7:10 (1068 reads) |
IOT
[博客]
[个人文集]
游客
|
|
|
作者：Anonymous 在 罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org
辛普森案恰恰现了美国司法公正。辩护律师的主要论点是阴谋论。是腐败的警察栽赃
陷害辛普森。 那个警察有动机， 有前科，有条件(所有对辛普森不利的关键证据都
是他发现的。抽的辛普森的血也是他送去化验的。而这血偏偏就莫名其妙的少了)
此人在法庭作证时撒谎，被辩护律师揭穿。
Henry 李在法庭上的证词对陪审团的裁决起了关键性作用。Henry 李可是世界知名
的大侦探。
辩护到如此程度，已经很难说辩方的说法是天方夜谭。美国司法的特点之一是宁可
放过一千个坏人，也不能冤枉一个好人。
The most talked-about aspect of the defense case undoubtedly concerned Mark
Fuhrman, the LAPD officer who had found the bloody glove and who, as a prosecution witness, denied using the word "nigger." It turned out that Fuhrman had used "the n word"--many times--and it was on tape. Laura Hart McKinny, an aspiring screenwriter from North Carolina, had hired Fuhrman to consult with her on police issues for a script she was writing. McKinny taped her interviews with Fuhrman, who not only used the offensive racial slur, but disclosed that he had sometimes planted evidence to help secure convictions. Needless to say, the defense wanted McKinny on the stand, and they wanted the jury to hear selected portions of her tapes. The prosecution strenuously objected, arguing that McKinny's testimony was irrelevant absent some plausible evidence suggesting that evidence was planted in the Simpson case. The prejudicial value of the testimony, the prosecution insisted, would exceed its probative value. Judge Ito, somewhat reluctantly, allowed the defense evidence. Ito's decision opened the door for the defense to offer its rather fantastic theory that Fuhrman took a glove from the Bundy crime scene, rubbed it in Nicole's blood, then took it to Rockingham to drop outside Kaelin's bedroom so as to frame Simpson.
It may not, however, have been Fuhrman, but rather a soft-spoken Chinese-American forensic expert named Henry Lee that won Simpson his acquittal. Lee had solid credentials, smiled at the jury, and provided what seemed to be a plausible justification for questioning the prosecution's key physical evidence. Lee raised doubts with blood splatter demonstrations, his suggestion that shoe print evidence suggested more than one assailant, and his simple conclusion about the prosecution's DNA tests: "Something's wrong." He may have, as Christopher Darden speculated after the trial, have been the person who gave the jury "permission" to do what they wanted to do anyway: acquit Simpson. Jury forewoman, Amanda Cooley, called Lee "a very impressive gentleman." Another juror agreed, describing Lee as "the most credible witness," a person who "had a lot of impact on a lot of people."
http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/Simpson/simpson.htm
作者：Anonymous 在 罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org |
|
|
| 返回顶端 |
|
 |
| |
|
|
您不能在本论坛发表新主题
您不能在本论坛回复主题
您不能在本论坛编辑自己的文章
您不能在本论坛删除自己的文章
您不能在本论坛发表投票
您不能在这个论坛添加附件
您不能在这个论坛下载文件
|
based on phpbb, All rights reserved.
|
