海纳百川

登录 | 登录并检查站内短信 | 个人设置 网站首页 |  论坛首页 |  博客 |  搜索 |  收藏夹 |  帮助 |  团队  | 注册  | RSS
主题: 关注Grutter v. Bollinger的看过来
回复主题   printer-friendly view    海纳百川首页 -> 罕见奇谈
阅读上一个主题 :: 阅读下一个主题  
作者 关注Grutter v. Bollinger的看过来   
所跟贴 关注Grutter v. Bollinger的看过来 -- Anonymous - (21710 Byte) 2003-6-06 周五, 上午9:45 (363 reads)

[博客]
[个人文集]

游客









文章标题: 这篇文就是4月份oral argument的重点加9人判决的预测啊 (127 reads)      时间: 2003-6-06 周五, 上午11:35

作者:Anonymous罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org

Conservative: Rehnquist/Scalia/Thomas/ -- No Compelling interest. Scalia 是最坚定反对AA的大法官,老黑Thomas虽本人是AA的受益者,在过去10多年里多次否定了AA的合宪性,不过没准这次会给大家一个surprise.



Liberal: Ginsburg/Stevens/Breyer/Souter -- Yes. Steven是Scalia的反面,他一定会投AA一票。Breyer 也很有可能(见上文的suggestion).



Swing votes -- O'Connor -- unknown. 最捉摸不定的是她。

-- Kennedy -- suspect -- "disguised quota": 虽说是摇摆派,但此次冒了一“伪装配额”,多半是和Rehnquist站一块。



结论:4 v. 4 + ?(O'Connor) = ? -- 果然是够吊胃口。事隔20多年(Bakke在1978),最高院终于重拾此问题,预计判决对一系列各个领域的AA将有重大影响。不过也难说,看看上文的作者说的: With the "compelling state interest" question apparently postponed for a future case, it looks like "Bakke today, Bakke tomorrow, Bakkeforever."





我周一模拟辩论的提纲:



To survive constitutional review, the Law School's consideration of race and ethnicity must (1) serve a compelling state interest and (2) be narrowly tailored to achieve that interest. see Adarand v. pena.



A. State university law school had a compelling interest in achieving a diverse student body for purposes of determining whether its consideration of race and ethnicity in its admissions decisions violated EP Clause of 14th Amend.



- Strict Scrutiny

- look at Bakke Case -- Justice Powell's opinion (binding or not?)





B. The Admissions policy was narrowly tailored to serve its compelling interest in achieving a diverse student body, .... no violation of EP.



- race alone was not the exclusive components .. (take all of the accomp. info into consideration, no quota, signle rather than dual-track admissions systems)



- has adequately considered race-neutral alternatives



- Although lacks a definite time limit, that does not render .. unconsitutional automatically. A time limit is required for a race-conscious remedial program, as suggested in Adarand case, but unlike a remedial interest, an interest in academic diversity does not have a self-contained stopping point. -- exists independently.



- better position and acts in good faith in exercising its edu. judgment.



- The "critical mass" is not the equivalent of a quota.







作者:Anonymous罕见奇谈 发贴, 来自 http://www.hjclub.org
返回顶端
显示文章:     
回复主题   printer-friendly view    海纳百川首页 -> 罕见奇谈 所有的时间均为 北京时间


 
论坛转跳:   
不能在本论坛发表新主题
不能在本论坛回复主题
不能在本论坛编辑自己的文章
不能在本论坛删除自己的文章
不能在本论坛发表投票
不能在这个论坛添加附件
不能在这个论坛下载文件


based on phpbb, All rights reserved.
[ Page generation time: 0.107932 seconds ] :: [ 22 queries excuted ] :: [ GZIP compression enabled ]